Binder v. aetna life insurance brief8/18/2023 Both sides presented skillfully prepared and helpful letter briefs. To assist in further development of the issues, we authorized further briefing. It is not so clear from the evidence presented, however, that a reasonable trier of fact would necessarily have to resolve the issues in favor of the defendant employer. The evidence suggests a strong possibility, perhaps a strong likelihood, that a trier of fact would resolve the issues in favor of the defendant employer on the "good cause" termination issue. The trial court granted summary judgment for the defendant employer. Plaintiff employee sued defendant employer for 1) breach of an implied-in-fact contract not to terminate except for "good cause," and 2) age discrimination. Chamberlin for Defendants and Respondents. Paul Baskett for Plaintiff and Appellant. (Opinion by Zebrowski, J., with Nott, Acting P. (Superior Court of Los Angeles County, No. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Defendants and Respondents.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |